Tag Archives: prostitution

LOSERS Lament: Perkins, Brown, Maggie and Other Bigots Cry Over Prop 8/DOMA Loss

LOSER

 

Gary Bauer – Failed GOP presidential candidate:

“The ultimate goal of homosexual-rights activists is not to legalize same-sex marriage. Rather, it is to silence those who disagree with them and, if necessary, to throw them in jail. In a world in which the biblical viewpoint of marriage is demonized, it does not take a constitutional scholar to predict that soon those who hold that view will find themselves in court. How did we get to the point where homosexual-rights activists would be clamoring to redefine society’s oldest and most reliable institution and people of faith would be worried about being fined or jailed for teaching their faith?”

Chick-Fil-A president Dan Cathy – Still serving that HATE sandwich Cathy tweeted and then deleted the above message. The company’s spokesman has refused to discuss the tweet

Chick-fil-a hate tweet

Poppin’ Douche GOP doughboy NJ Governor Christie Slams SCOTUS Rulings –

“I don’t think it was appropriate. I think it was wrong. [snip] I’ve made it very clear since 2009 that I believe that marriage should be between one man and one woman. I’ve said that, I ran on that, I’ve said it consistently. That doesn’t mean, in any way shape or form, that I have anything against folks who are homosexual. In fact, I’ve said I believe people are born that way. I don’t believe it’s a choice … you were born with your sexual preference. But I believe that the institution of marriage for 2,000 years has been between a man and a woman.”

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops,  headed by Archbishop Timothy Dolan and Archbishop and drunk driver Salvatore Cordileone –

“Today is a tragic day for marriage and our nation. The Supreme Court  has dealt a profound injustice to the American people by striking down  in part the federal Defense of Marriage Act.  The Court got it wrong.  The federal government ought to respect the truth that marriage is the  union of one man and one woman, even where states fail to do so. The  preservation of liberty and justice requires that all laws, federal and  state, respect the truth, including the truth about marriage. It is also unfortunate that the Court did not take the opportunity to uphold  California’s Proposition 8 but instead decided not to rule on the  matter. The common good of all, especially our children, depends upon a  society that strives to uphold the truth of marriage. Now is the time to redouble our efforts in witness to this truth. These decisions are part of a public debate of great consequence. The future of marriage and the well-being of our society hang in the balance.”

Yes On 8  President Andy Pugno –

“California’s Constitution says that only an appellate court, not a single trial court judge, can stop a proposition’s enforcement statewide.  As of today, there is no such ruling.  Nevertheless, the Governor and Attorney General today rushed forward with plans to make same-sex ‘marriage’ licenses available throughout California in the next three or four weeks. And that is where it sits this evening.  Our Legal Team is closely examining today’s court rulings, and assessing what, if any, options are available to us to keep Proposition 8 in force. This is a time for careful consideration and discernment, and we thank you in advance for your patience and continued support.”

Family Research Council hate group leader Tony Perkins –

“By a single vote, five unelected justices determined that they know better than God and struck at the heart of marriage in America. It was a powerful rebuke of a law FRC helped develop, the Defense of Marriage Act, but not the final blow. Fortunately, conservative leaders across our country aren’t about to let that happen. In interview after interview, tweet after tweet, the  message echoed from Governor’s mansions to congressional floors: we are  not giving up. It started with Rep. Michele Bachmann  (R-MN) and flooded the wires since then. Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-KS)  vowed to lead the fight for a Federal Marriage Amendment. Governor Mike  Pence (R-IN) said he would use today’s rulings as motivation to work  even harder for a state marriage amendment. Are these rulings demoralizing? Definitely. But we will not let a court’s definition of marriage define us.”

National Organization for Marriage Million Dollar Hate group leader Brian Brown, (typing through an unending flood of bitter, bitter tears.)

“I am furious about what the Court has done. We at NOM and tens of millions of other Americans will never accept it. It’s wrong, plain and simple. There’s a stench to these decisions that has stained the Supreme Court. Will you show your outrage at the Court and make a special contribution to allow NOM to coalesce Americans behind a national movement to preserve marriage? Please make an urgent, emergency financial contribution to our Win More States fund — today. The work that NOM does has never been more urgently needed than it is right now, and we are totally dependent on you, our faithful supporters, to help us continue the fight. Will you join us in expressing your outrage? Please make an emergency contribution right now so that we can immediately launch a nationwide grassroots effort to protest the decisions, and preserve marriage in the 38 states that have laws in place defending marriage.”

Michele Batshit Crazy Bachmann –

“For thousands of years of recorded human history, no society has defended the legal standard of marriage as anything other than between man and woman. Only since 2000 have we seen a redefinition of this foundational unit of society in various nations.  Today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to join the trend, despite the clear will of the people’s representatives through DOMA. What the Court has done will undermine the best interest of children and the best interests of the United States.”

Save California head Randy Thomasson (whose hate gravy train has just derailed)

“Sexual behavior does not constitute a civil right, but the Supreme Court has done vast damage to man-woman marriage, the foundation of the natural family. The high court’s refusal to correct the unconstitutional rulings of lower-court judges and the dereliction of duty by constitution-bound state officials demonstrates that not only is natural, man-woman marriage no longer respected but neither is our republic and system of written laws. Because the high court didn’t care about protecting natural marriage or even the initiative process, they have allowed unnatural, homosexual ‘marriages’ to resume in California as role models for children. Today, marriage, children, and the rule of law all suffer.”

And last but not least…….

Maggie Gallagher the Talking Cow –

“The Supreme Court has just abandoned 7 million voters, giving us no  justice and no access to the courts..  The California Supreme Court made it clear that the proponents of Prop 8 are delegated the right to  defend the law if state official refuse to do so.  But after accepting  standing in DOMA because. . .well because it wanted to, the majority of  the Supreme Court justices simply punted unable to recognize a clear  injustice in kicking out of court people who have devoted thousands of  hours to the democratic process –and $3 million to the defense of the  law–that the Court today treats as beggars with no interest in the  outcome.”

Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelicious.

 

Louisiana Sex Law Violated LGBT Constitutional Rights, Federal Judge Rules

A federal judge ruled Thursday that Louisiana’s  Crime Against Nature by Solicitation (CANS) law, which  is mainly used on black transgender prostitutes and other women which requires them if found guilty to register as sex offenders is unconstitutional.

In Louisiana, the state prostitution law does not require registration as a sex offender.  But Louisiana Police and prosecutors had unfettered discretion in choosing which law to charge under. The judge found that the discrepancy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.

Apart from LGBT, the law was also being discriminatorily applied against poor black women.

Said Alexis Agathocleous, staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, which brought the case:

“[The] decision is a powerful vindication of our clients’ right to equal protection before the law. The court has agreed that they have been singled out for this harsh treatment without a legitimate or rational purpose, and that this cannot stand.”

Wrote Judge Martin L. C. Feldman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana:

“The defendants [Louisiana Attorney General James “Buddy” Caldwell] fail to credibly serve up even one unique legitimating governmental interest that can rationally explain the registration requirement imposed on those convicted of Crime Against Nature by Solicitation.”

“The Court is left with no other conclusion but that the relationship between the classification is so shallow as to render the distinction wholly arbitrary,” he wrote.

Feldman said the issue before him was “not about approval or disapproval of sexual beliefs or mores. It is about the mandate of equality that is enshrined in the Constitution.”