Tag Archives: lies and garbage

Liberty Counsel's Mat Staver: The Equality Act “Opens Door To Pedophilia”

Liberty Counsel Hate Group Money Beg: We Need $$$’s To Defend LGBT Hate Crime Perpetrators and Defeat The Equality Act

Via press release from Liberty Counsel hate group leader Mat Staver:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1990 that burning the American flag is First Amendment protected speech. But if you burn an LGBT flag, it’s another story. An Iowa court just sentenced a man to 16 years in prison after he torched an LGBT flag.

That’s a hate crime in Iowa, which means Adolfo Martinez, who stole the pro-homosexual banner off a church and used lighter fluid to set it aflame, will spend the next decade-and-a-half behind bars.

What he did was wrong, but no one was hurt or verbally threatened. Sixteen years is an extreme and disproportionate sentence. It’s also an ominous signal of LGBT power and the growing threat it poses to your freedom and mine.

That’s why—with your help—we fought throughout this year to STOP the radical LGBT assault on freedom misnamed as the “Equality Act.”

What Mat Staver doesn’t mention and what many don’t know is that Martinez got such a long sentence because Iowa has a three strikes-style mandatory sentencing guideline passed by the Republican state legislature. Not only because he torched a rainbow PRIDE flag.

Hate Group Christianity 101

Invent a threat, leave out pertinent information to justify your hate, invent a solution, ask for money.

Easier than working.

You can see the Liberty Counsel’s 990 Tax return by CLICKING HERE

Fox Host Jesse Watters Caught Spreading Propaganda About COVID: “All The Hot Spots Are In Huge Dem Cities” - VIDEO

Focus on the Family Hate Group Founder James Dobson: If Martin Luther King Was Alive Today He’d Oppose The Equality Act

James Dobson, founder of one of America’s so-called “christian” anti-LGBT hate groups Focus on the Family wrote an op-ed on behalf of his James Dobson Family Institute where he condemned the Equality Act which would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to give federal protections to LGBT american citizens calling it “treacherous”, “radical”, and claiming that the late great Martin Luther King Jr. would be opposed to it.

Wrote Dobson:

“Make no mistake – the so-called Equality Act is nothing but a thinly veiled attempt to finish off religious liberty in America once and for all, which ought to be plainly obvious based upon a cursory reading of the First Amendment.

The proposal, H.R. 5 and S. 788, would provide special protections for the LGBT community throughout American society. It would state that religious beliefs are not a defense in a dispute between gay rights and constitutionally protected religious rights.

I wish I could say I was shocked to see the speed with which Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats have brought to committee the sweet sounding but entirely treacherous Equality Act.

This decision demonstrates a frightening willingness by those on the left to advance a radical social agenda at a time when our nation already faces so many other divisive challenges.

Simply put, by creating a protected class of citizens out of the LGBT community, this bill places Christians who believe in traditional marriage at grave legal and civil jeopardy.

While no evangelical Christian would ever support hate or violence of any kind against an LGBT individual – or any other person for that matter – to modify the 1964 Civil Rights Act with this wrong-headed bill would not only be legally fraught, it would also put moral equivalence to the unprecedented, centuries-long struggle of countless millions of African Americans to gain freedom from slavery and the persistent, systematic oppression that followed.

Dobson said that whereas “the Civil Rights movement of the 60s was born out of deep faith and in congruence with God’s Word, this bill tramples both underfoot.

In fact, I believe that if Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, we would be standing together in opposition to the Equality Act. We must refrain from the dangerous tendency to divide America into smaller and smaller sub-groups defined first and foremost by our grievances. We are one nation, under God, and we are already blessed with a Constitution and First Amendment that protects every American without criminalizing our most sincerely held religious beliefs.”

What Dobson fails to mention that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits employment discrimination based on color, race, … employment discrimination on the basis of an individual’s religion, so it is itself a special protected class of citizen.

As for Martin Luther King, Jr., he was not an advocate of LGBT rights, nor was he an enemy, The truth is no one really knows because MLK never publicly talked about the subject. But what we do know is that his right-hand man Bayard Rustin was an openly gay man and that his widow, Coretta Scott King has has been an outspoken supporter of LGBT rights.

Gay History - January 8, 1962: Two Men Arrested for “Abominable Act and Detestable Crime Against Nature” In North Carolina Under 429-Year-Old Law

Family Research Council: The Equality Act Is Not Needed Since Gays Can Become Straight

Via the very un-christian, Christian Post:


The truth is, “sexual orientation” is a multi-faceted concept, involving a combination of attractions, behaviors, and personal identity. These four studies all demonstrate that significant change in each of the elements of sexual orientation is possible.


The percentage changing from homosexuality to heterosexuality ranged from 13% to 53% (while the percentage changing from heterosexuality to homosexuality ranged only from 1% to 12%). In one survey of “same-sex attracted respondents,” up to 38% of men and 53% of women “changed to heterosexuality” in only a six-year period.


In light of this evidence, the public would be wise to question whether the efforts of the LGBT movement to ride on the coat-tails of “civil rights” can any longer be justified. Indeed, the science shows that the evidence for immutability—on which many have relied to argue for such legislation—simply isn’t there. If Congress truly wants to pursue “evidence-based” policy, it will reject the “Equality Act” and its deceptive premise. – Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council

And Christians could become non-Christians. Why protect them under the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

Thumbnail
FRC's Tony Perkins: Tony Perkins: The Equality Act Would Make LGBT Citizens “The Most Protected Class In America”

FRC’s Tony Perkins: The Equality Act Would Make LGBT Citizens “The Most Protected Class In America”

Via press release from Family Research Council hate group leader Tony Perkins:

It wasn’t enough that House Democrats put the transgender pride flag outside their offices — now they’re trying to plant one in U.S. law too. If you like the idea of your daughter changing in front of a teenage boy, financing your employees’ sex changes, abolishing girls’ sports, and getting fired for using the wrong pronoun, then boy, does Speaker Nancy Pelosi have the bill for you.

Liberals call it the Equality Act, but as yesterday’s hearing made quite clear, the only equal thing about it is how much damage it does to every facet of American life. Democrats will insist this is about ending discrimination, when it’s really about punishing anyone who disagrees with their fanatical LGBT agenda. For liberals like Pelosi, this is the ultimate prize after years of feigning concern for things like freedom and conscience.

Once the Left gets its hands on the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the nine other laws this bill would rewrite, gender identity and sexual orientation will be the most protected classes in America. Gone would be the centuries of religious liberty, open debate, and free speech. As far as the Left is concerned, those are just the price of “tolerance.”

Perkins forget to mention that “religion” is also protected under the 1964 Equality Act so even “faux Christians” like himself and his “faux Christian” hate group are covered and protected.

Thumbnail

American Family Association Launches Petition To Congress To Stop Navy From Naming Ship After “Pedophile” Harvey Milk

American Family Association Launches Petition To Congress To Stop Navy From Naming Ship After "Pedophile" Harvey Milk

 

Well we knew all knew it was coming.

The American Family Association hate group has launched a petition to Congress to stop the US Navy from naming a ship for the late, great gay activist Harvey Milk.

It reads:

The Navy is set to name a ship after the late homosexual rights icon and San Francisco politician Harvey Milk, according to a Congressional notification obtained by USNI News.

The July 14, 2016 notification, signed by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, indicated he intended to name a planned Military Sealift Command fleet oiler USNS Harvey Milk (T-AO-206).

Harvey Milk was the first homosexual activist elected to public office in the United States and was assassinated in 1978. That record plus the fact that Milk, who bragged about being a pedophile, served in the Navy at a time it was illegal for homosexuals to do so, apparently justifies naming a Navy ship in his honor.

Harvey Milk was a sexual predator who preyed upon teen boys. According to The Mayor of Castro Street, Milk’s very favorable biography by Randy Shilts, in 1963, when Milk was 33, he took in “Jack” Galen McKinley, a 16-year-old runaway in New York City “who was looking for some kind of father figure,” to live with him as a lover. (click here for photo)

While Jack was still a minor, Milk moved him to San Francisco. However, when Jack matured beyond Milk’s taste for young guys, Milk dropped him.

Jack McKinney was highly disturbed and frequently suicidal after being rejected by Milk.  The Mayor of Castro Street records Milk’s shocking coldness when told of his former boy lover’s suicide threat. “Tell him not to make a mess,” Milk said. Eventually Jack died in a fall from the eighth floor of a building, in an apparent suicide.

Slander against Harvey aside, and believe me it is slander. What will they do when this petition fails? Boycott the Navy?

The AFA is going to Milk this one for all it’s worth.

Franklin Graham On ABC’s This Week: Happy Easter! He Is Risen and Gay Parents Are Going To Hell

Evil Prayers

“Reverand” Franklin Graham the legacy grifter following in his fathers footsteps and Ralph Reed appeared today, Easter Sunday  on ABC’s This Week today to denounce gay parenting and gay adoption and spread blatant Mark Regnerus type lies, adding that  then  that gay people can go to heaven as soon as they stop being gay.

“The social science on this is clear,” Reed said. “This isn’t about Vladimir Putin, this is about what’s best for children here in the United States. The social science is irrefutable: a child who grows up in a home without the mother and father present, and they both very unique procreative, nurturing, and socializing roles, they’re nine times more likely to end up dropping out of high school; they’re five times more likely to end up in poverty; and they’re three times more likely to end up addicted to drugs and alcohol.”

“But the social science is also irrefutable that a child raised in an orphanage is in much worse shape than a child raised in a home,” Roberts objected. “And the fact that people are willing to take these children and raise them, and raise them in a loving way, is clearly better for these children.” “Would you agree with that?” host Martha Raddatz asked. “Would you rather have a child sitting in an orphanage than have gay parents?” “I think the social science is just simply not in yet on same-sex couples,” Reed said, in a notable departure from his comment thirty seconds ago. “I think the law has every right to set an ideal. And the ideal is a mother and a father.”

So whats worse.  Graham’s and Reed’s utter lies and bullshit?  Or  ABC hosting this anti-gay hate-mongering grifter and a sleazy conman (guess who’s who) on a “news” show on Easter morning?

Starts at the 5 minute mark.


ABC US News | ABC Business News

HRC Spins Like A Whirling Dervish, Makes Mountain Out Of Their Sochi Olympics Molehill

Gay Inc

“Even before the Olympics began, HRC has been holding corporate America’s feet to the fire on their support for Putin’s Olympics. We’ve tracked the coverage that NBC—the network group broadcasting the Olympics—has dedicated to LGBT issues during the Olympic Games. We’ve vigorously called on Olympic sponsors to speak up and condemn Russia’s anti-LGBT laws, and we’ve celebrated those, like AT&T, which have lifted their voices. – From an email blast and money beg sent out by the Human Rights Campaign today.

Of course HRC is not mentioning that they haven’t severed ties with either Coke or Visa who are BOTH corporate sponsors of the Sochi Olympics games and on two separate occasions they were caught serving Coke products at HRC events.

Hollow words and if anyone in the LGBT community believes them. Then they have empty heads.

 

Fox New’s “Dr” Keith Ablow: There Is No Such Thing As Being Transgender

Ablow Quack

Dr.” Keith Ablow, a member of Fox News’ “Medical A Team,” is continuing his propaganda filled and baseless smears against LGBT people this time with an ill-informed, transphobic rant against a new California law that allows transgender students to use bathrooms that match their gender identities. Ablow used the same “bathroom panic” lie that’s been central to Fox’s c overage of the legislation and all anti-LGBT groups as well as extremist conservative GOP members.

“I don’t see anything but toxicity from the notion of a person with female anatomy feeling free to use the urinal in the boys’ rest room while a boy stands next to her and uses one, too.

Governor Brown is one of the liberal politicians in the world who wants to sell people on the idea that he loves freedom when he is actually addicted to disempowering people.  

And shaking the certain knowledge in boys and girls of whether they can count on not being seen naked by the opposite gender, not to mention whether they are themselves actually the gender they thought they were, is a powerful, devious and pathological way to weaken them by making them question their sense of safety, security and certainty about anything and everything.”

Ablow also went on to falsely state  that there’s no proof that transgender people even exist.

“I don’t believe we have definitive data (although many psychiatrists with very impressive credentials, who seem to mean well, assert that we do) that any male or female soul has ever in the history of the world been born into the wrong anatomic gender.”

Let me put that more clearly:  I am not convinced by any science I can find that people with definitively male DNA and definitively male anatomy can actually be locked in a cruel joke of nature because they are actually female.

Ablow is a bad medical joke. He has a long history of purposely misinforming and commenting on issues that he’s completely unqualified to discuss, Ablow is also one of the network’s most vocal defenders of junk “ex-gay” therapy programs and lashes out against the American Psychological Association for being politically motivated whenever its stances don’t comport with his bigoted views.

Ablow’s dangerous and intentionally misleading hyperbole and pseudoscience discredit him as a medical professional.

If Ablow really is a “Doctor” through the American Medical Association his credentials must be revoked immediately.  He is a danger to LGBT Americans everywhere.

Source: Media Matters

Indiana House Chambers Bursts Into Laughter When Speaker Calls LGBT’s “Intolerant”

Jim Bopp, an anti-LGBT attorney who was forced out as Indiana’s representative to the Republican National Committee in 2012, told the committee that he was perplexed as to why opponents would be against a constitutional ban if same sex marriage was already illegal in Indiana.

“It can only be because [the existing ban is] vulnerable,” he insisted. “They want the option of getting what they actually want, which is to change the definition marriage. And the very vulnerability of a statute as opposed to a constitutional amendment affords them a greater opportunity to get that job done.

“Even more troubling though was an argument made by one who said that the simple debate on the marriage amendment will do the damage,” Bopp added. “Well, what does that tell you? That there are some people that are so intolerant of other people’s views that a simple debate…”

At that, the chairman was forced to call the committee to order as the gallery burst into laughter.

“A simple debate about the question offends them to the extent that they want to leave the state,” Bopp said. “And even more troubling than that, it’s a direct attack upon democracy.”

Bopp worked as a legal adviser to Citizens United leading up to their victory in the Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission also just happens to represent the National Organization for Marriage.

Source: Raw Story

NOM and Brian Brown Go F**king Insane: The Federal Government Will Sue Us Anti-Gay Bigots!

Bryan Brown evil

 

The National Organization For Marriage and Brian Brown are crossing the line from an anti-gay hate group to fanatical fringe anti-gay hate group.

Brown in a recent email beat the dead horse of the Phil Robertson Duck Dynasty debacle by sending out an crazed propaganda email and petition call that claims that the American government will, in fact, sue vocal anti-gay bigots in the future. (If only)

Dear Marriage Supporter,

There’s a bigger picture surrounding the recent media sideshow involving Phil Robertson’s unjust persecution by Hollywood liberals. A bigger threat looms on the horizon, one that impacts each one of us. And I’m asking you to join the National Organization for Marriage today in standing up to that threat by signing an important new petition we launched just yesterday.

When Phil Robertson expressed his personal religious beliefs and values in his interview with GQ, the self-appointed “thought police” of the homosexual lobby was quick to pounce and begin their “prosecution” (really, persecution).

We all know how things unfolded from there: A&E executives caved to the pressure of Hollywood bullies; a groundswell of unprecedented support for Phil (including our own petition that you signed — thanks again!) soon flooded A&E’s inboxes; and finally the network reversed course and reinstated Phil to his show. But, imagine for a moment…

…Imagine that the situation didn’t involve a high-powered lobby and busy-body “thought police.” Imagine instead that Phil had been up against the full force of the government and the actual police.

…Imagine that it hadn’t been a network with the mere ability to hire and fire. Imagine instead that the man-in-charge was a federal judge, able to saddle Phil with criminal “hate-speech” charges, civil rights violations, and onerous fines.

…Imagine that it wasn’t just a Hollywood clique and cabal disapproving of a certain celebrity’s Christian values. Imagine instead a new State regime wherein those values were the legal and cultural equivalent of racism, and any citizen expressing those values was subject to punishment.

This is what our country is facing if the same-sex ‘marriage’ movement gets its way: a society in which not just Phil and other celebrities who voice Christian values are put in the crosshairs and targeted for persecution, but any ordinary citizen who believes in traditional values — ordinary citizens like you and me — will be liable to sanction.

We’ve already seen this sort of thing happen, and not even just in states where same-sex ‘marriage’ has been forced on the people. Even in places where true marriage is still the law, we’ve seen florists, bakers, photographers, bed and breakfast owners and others have found themselves facing penalizing fines and hauled into court as bigots simply for maintaining that marriage is the union of a man and a woman!

That is why we must act today, to ensure that that never comes to pass for our nation. We need to tell Congress right now to amend the US Constitution to protect the identity of marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Click here to sign our petition and send this urgently-needed message.

The stakes are truly that high. Federal judicial activism has run amok, most recently in the State of Utah where a single federal judge tried to throw out the state’s marriage amendment — enacted by a strong majority of both the legislature and the citizenry. So brazen was this move that the Supreme Court — in a very rare move — decided unanimously to stay that decision while the State of Utah defends the amendment in court!

The fact is, we just cannot let something as crucial as the definition of marriage rest in the hands of an out-of-control federal judiciary. And remember, defending and defining marriage in our constitution is essential to protecting our First Amendment rights. If marriage is redefined nationwide, traditional views and values like Phil Robertson expresses will be forced from the public square and even possibly made grounds for criminal action!

So please act right now and sign this important petition. It will only take a minute of your time. Your voice is needed so that Congress hears this message loud and clear: our right to express our values is under attack, and must be protected!

Thank you for joining us in this very important fight.

Faithfully,

Brian S. Brown

P.S.: Please take a moment to sign this important petition right away. And when you’ve finished, please share this message via email, or post on Facebook and Twitter so that we can gain as many signatures as possible for this important cause!

Insanity doesn’t run in Brian Brown’s family.  It fucking gallops!