Tag Archives: frothy mix

TCNN WTF? - CNN Hires Anti-Gay Rick "Frothy Mix" Santorum As “Senior Political Commentator”

CNN WTF? – CNN Hires Anti-Gay Rick “Frothy Mix” Santorum As “Senior Political Commentator”

The Hill reports:

CNN is adding a new group of political contributors and commentators, including a former presidential candidate and a reporter who shot to prominence covering President-elect Donald Trump. Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), who ran for president in 2012 and 2016, is joining the network as a political commentator, along with former Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm (D).

The Washington Post’s David Fahrenthold and Wesley Lowery will be joining as contributors, along with J.D. Vance of National Review and Salena Zito of the Washington Examiner. Fahrenthold in October broke the story of Trump’s “Access Hollywood” video, in which he brags about sexually assaulting women. He also investigated Trump’s claims of charitable donations.

I guess CNN really is fake news.

Fuck you CNN.  Just Fuck You.


Rick Santorum’s Top 10 Anti-Gay Comments

*“Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: that society is based on the future of the society. And that’s what? Children. Monogamous relationships. In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality.” (2003)

*“If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does.” (2003)

*“I guess because you stand for traditional marriage and you believe that, you know, that people should, we should have a society that affirms one man and one woman as marriage, that makes you someone who’s a hater, someone that doesn’t, doesn’t like people. I disagree with people, by the way, who are gay and straight who believe in changing the marriage laws. But it’s a public policy discussion, and this is the, this is really the problem that we see on the left which is the personalization of politics. I mean, we have a policy disagreement, and, and which I am very passionate about. I admit that. Because I do believe the family, integrity of the family is important for the future of our country. But that does not mean that, that I don’t like people or I hate people or that there’s something wrong. The only thing that’s wrong is their opinion.” (2011)

*“But what I can say is that the state is not doing a service to the child and to society by not putting that child in a home where there is a mother and a father. This is common sense. This is nature. And what we’re trying to do is defy nature because a certain group of people want to be affirmed by society. And I just don’t think that’s to the benefit of society or to the child.” (2011)

*“Is anyone saying same-sex couples can’t love each other? I love my children. I love my friends, my brother. Heck, I even love my mother-in-law. Should we call these relationships marriage, too?” (2008)

*“I’m worried when many people will stand up and say, ‘well whatever the Generals want.’ I’m not too sure that we haven’t indoctrinated the Officer Corps in this country that they can actually see straight to make the right decisions.” (On repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell) (2011)

*On gay adoption: “A lesbian woman came up to me and said, ‘why are you denying me my right?’ I said, ‘well, because it’s not a right.’ It’s a privilege that society recognizes because society sees intrinsic value to that relationship over any other relationship.” (2011)

*“I certainly would not approve of [a bill moving through the California legislature compels the state to add gay history to the state education curriculum], but there’s a logical consequence to the courts injecting themselves in creating rights and people attaching their legislative ideas to those rights that in some respects could logically flow from that. So I’m not surprised.” (On teaching LGBT history in schools) (2011)

*“I would argue, this right to privacy … doesn’t exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold — Griswold was the contraceptive case — and abortion. And now we’re just extending it out. And the further you extend it out, the more you — this freedom actually intervenes and affects the family. You say, well, it’s my individual freedom. Yes, but it destroys the basic unit of our society because it condones behavior that’s antithetical to strong healthy families. Whether it’s polygamy, whether it’s adultery, where it’s sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family.” (2003)

* “ I have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts. As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships. And that includes a variety of different acts, not just homosexual. I have nothing, absolutely nothing against anyone who’s homosexual. If that’s their orientation, then I accept that. And I have no problem with someone who has other orientations. The question is, do you act upon those orientations? So it’s not the person, it’s the person’s actions. And you have to separate the person from their actions.” (2003)

“In this case, what we’re talking about, basically, is priests who were having sexual relations with post-pubescent men. We’re not talking about priests with 3-year-olds, or 5-year-olds. We’re talking about a basic homosexual relationship.” (On the Catholic Church’s international pedophile priests scandal, in which, for decades, priests have sexually assaulted, molested, and raped young boys and girls.) (2003)

TCNN WTF? - CNN Hires Anti-Gay Rick "Frothy Mix" Santorum As “Senior Political Commentator”

Trump Picks Rick “Man on Dog” Santorum For Catholic Advisory Group, Vows To Protect “Religious Liberty”

Trump Picks Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum For Catholic Advisory Group, Vows To Protect "Religious Liberty"

Looks like Ricky “Man on Dog” Santorum has a new gig that is just perfect for his extreme homophobic skill set.

The Washington Blade:

In one fell swoop, Donald Trump has fortified the anti-LGBT positions he expressed over his campaign and tapped as an adviser former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum, a two-time presidential candidate with a notoriously anti-LGBT history.

The actions are the result of Trump’s creation of a 35-member Catholic Advisory Council, which includes, in addition to Santorum, other individuals with anti-LGBT histories.

Accompanying the creation of the council is a new statement from Trump outlining “Issues of Importance to Catholics” and reiterating his support for the First Amendment Defense Act, a federal “religious freedom” bill seen to enable anti-LGBT discrimination.

Emphasizing his commitment to “religious liberty,” Trump hints at opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of same-sex marriage and President Obama’s executive order barring anti-LGBT discrimination among federal contractors.

“Religious liberty is enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution,” Trump said. “It is our first liberty and provides the most important protection in that it protects our right of conscience. Activist judges and executive orders issued by presidents who have no regard for the Constitution have put these protections in jeopardy. If I am elected president and Congress passes the First Amendment Defense Act, I will sign it to protect the deeply held religious beliefs of Catholics and the beliefs of Americans of all faiths.”

In a 2003 interview Santorum brought up the then-pending U.S. Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, which challenged a Texas sodomy law, and said that “he did not have a problem with homosexuals, but a problem with homosexual acts”, “the right to privacy doesn’t exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution”, and “sodomy laws properly exist to prevent acts which undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family.”

Santorum also stated:

In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality.

The AP also quoted Santorum as saying, “If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything.” and “Whether it’s polygamy, whether it’s adultery, whether it’s sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family.”


Rick Santorum naked

From Santorum Studios: “One Generation Away” – Reagan and Nazi’s and Crosses, OH MY! (Video)

Coming to you directly from Rick Santorum’s EchoLight Propaganda Studios we have yeat another “Right-wing Christians are being persecuted” movie coming out in September this time featuring not only Ronald Reagan but also Mike Huckabee. And Nazis!

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction

The Religious Freedom clauses in the Constitution’s First Amendment are facing interpretation challenges on numerous fronts. One Generation Away visits the front lines of the changing face of religious liberty in the United States.”

Interestingly the first words in the the trailer (The Establishment Clause) invalidates the film’s purpose.

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”

Lets hope the same can be said about Republicans.


Tony Perkins Cares About Women and Polygamy. Santorum Blames Gay Marriage, and Brietbart Lies.


Well thanks to Kody and his Mormon harem from  the TLC’s trash hit Sister Wives hate group leaders, GOP lunatics and Right Wing “news” outlets are crawling out of the woodwork and having a field day that that Utah has become the 50th state to legalize unmarried cohabitation and is on the way to fully striking down its polygamy laws.

Family Resaech Council hate-group president and proven white supremacist Tony Perkins, took to the FRC website and writes that he’s worried about the poor women and children it will affect.  Oh and of scourer gay marriage

This decision is a real war on women and children as polygamy is a practice that has historically devalued the role of women and undermined the equality of a husband and wife that has become the standard in Western Civilization. The increasing awareness of the collateral cultural and religious carnage that accompanies the redefinition of natural marriage will cause the debate over same-sex marriage to intensify, not abate, despite the media’s relative silence and homosexual activists increasing campaign of intimidation. The multiple bouquets that may be thrown as this decision was handed down, may very well give the American people the inspiration to push back against those redefining natural marriage and with it the very underpinnings of America as it has been known.” 

Meanwhile old  Frothy Mix himself,  Rick “Man on Dog” Santorum took to Twitter and played the “I told you  so card” claiming that he totally predicted that gay marriage would lead to Utah to legalize unmarried cohabitation.

And then last but not least we have Breitbart.com which just out and out lied and blamed gay marriage for the ruling saying that the judge referenced it in his decision when in reality NOWHERE in the judge’s 91-page ruling do the words “same-sex marriage” ever appear.  Then again the piece was written by Ken Klukowski who happens to serve as Director of the Center for Religious Liberty at Tony Perkin’s Family Research Council and as an extra right-wing religious extremist bonus Klukowski also serves on the faculty at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University which happens to be home to another nationally recognized hate group; The Liberty Counsel.

I wonder why Ms. Perkins, Santorum and Brietbart didn’t cite the actual Bible. Oh, that’s right. The Bible actually advocates very heavily for polygamy which the ruling didn’t legalize anyway.




Rick “Frothy Mix” Santorum: The Movie Industry Is Run By SATAN!

Rick Santorum Devil

“This is a tough business, this is something that we’re stepping out, and the Devil for a long, long time has had this, these screens, for his playground and he isn’t going to give it up easily. And so I ask for your prayers for me, for our company, for TBN, for everybody involved in The Christmas Candle. And I just want to thank you in advance for your help in making this a successful venture going forward.” – Christian studio head Rick “Man on Dog – Frothy Mix” Santorum shilling for this new “Christian” Christmas movie The Christmas Candle soon to be in the 2 dollar bargain bin at a Big Lots near you.

Well not that I agree with ole Frothy Mix BUT it would explain all the crappy remakes lately.  Only Satan himself would think of remaking Carrie.

It’s Baaack! – Rick Santorum: GOP’s Acceptance of Gay Marriage Will Destory The “Republic”

Rick Santorum is gay

It’s baaaaack!

And just in time to start gearing up for another disastrous GOP Presidential run in 2016.

Late last month Rick Santorum of “Man on Dogfame spoke at the Midwest Republican Leadership Conference on social concerns.  Santorum is scared frothy mixless that his own party may be getting on board the marriage equality bus.

Right Wing Watch reports:

Blaming the shift in support for gay marriage on the television program “Will and Grace,” Santorum said that Christians are now afraid of speaking out against it for fear of being called bigots and haters. Complaining that the DOMA decision ruled that people who oppose gay marriage do so only because they hate people who are gay, Santorum predicated that churches will eventually lose their tax-exempt status because of it.

“We have hate crimes in this country,” Santorum warned, “for hate speech. It’s coming.”

Saying that “Christians are the most tolerant people in the world,” Santorum claimed that Christian opposition to gay marriage is no longer being tolerated and declared that “for the Republican Party to even contemplate going along with this is the destruction of our republic.”

By the way. The baby crying in the video below is actually translation.

Rick “Frothy Mix” Santorum: Dropping The Gay Ban Will ‘Murder’ the Boy Scouts

Rick Santorum is gay

Failed GOP Presidential nominee and anti-gay media whore ole “Frothy Mix” Rick Santorum himself warns that ending the Boy Scouts’ national ban on gay members could kill the group, and the group’s board would have “its fingerprints on the murder weapon.”

“Over the past 50 years, the left in America has successfully transformed American society. Among the long list of liberal victories is the growth of the welfare state, sexual liberation, removing God from the public square, abortion, affirmative action, redistribution of wealth, more government control of business, radical environmentalism and the transformation of the family.

So when I saw that the Boy Scouts of America executive board is convening on Wednesday to discuss abandoning the organization’s founding moral principles that nurture boys into men, I was saddened, but not surprised. It makes sense that men at the top of the food chain whose boys are insulated, although not immune, from the harmful effects of societal change are behind this effort. Board members James Turley, CEO of Ernst & Young, and Randall Stephenson, CEO of AT&T, are advocating for gay scoutmasters and scouts. They are joined by two big funders, UPS and Merck, that have signaled change or money will disappear.”

Drama Hate Queen. 

It’s just the freakin Boy Scouts.

Hat Tip: Holy Fucking Shitballs

“Good Christian” Rick Santorum Curses Out New York Times Reporter – Video

Whiny baby “poo-poo” Rick Santorum calls “bullshit” at New York Times reporter Jeff Zeleny.

Temper, temper Ricky.  You kiss your mother and suck dick with that mouth?

GOOGLE Flushes Dan Savage’s “Santorum” Definition Page From Top Search Result Spot

Suddenly, after 8 years Dan Savage’s page dedicated to the definition of “Santorum” as “the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.” no longer appears in the top search results (although the blog, connected to the site currently ranks fifth with Rick Santorum’s official election site now being number 1 in search results.

Dan Savage weighs in on the sudden ranking change:

“This, of course, is what Rick Santorum asked Google to do months ago. Google told Santorum they couldn’t, they told Santorum they wouldn’t, because www.spreadingsantorum.com was the legit #1 search result when you Googled his last name. It wasn’t a Google bomb, we weren’t gaming Google’s algoribbons or whatever. We were legit.

But tonight we’re gone. I’m not too sad about it—hey, we had a good run!—but I am a little mystified. Why now? Was it intentional? Did Google cave to the pressure?”

Back2Stonewall asked a Search Engine Optimization expert their opinion on this and they can only conclude that Google finally bucking to pressure to deliver a more “relevant” result and decided to push the result down Savages’s page to make the search results more palatable to the right, and lessen the voice of criticism from a minority group. That’s alarming, but not remotely surprising given the state of Google in 2012.