House Republicans Introduce Federal Version of "Don't Say Gay" Bill

Federal Judge Rules Against LGBT YouTuber Content Creators In ‘Censorship’ Lawsuit

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender YouTube content creators who said the company violated their First Amendment rights by “censoring” their clips.

In a decision issued Wednesday, U.S. District Court Magistrate Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose ruled that Google and YouTube are “private entities,” as opposed to government officials, and therefore are not bound by the First Amendment’s prohibition against restricting speech. “Plaintiffs do not state a claim … for violation of the First Amendment because defendants are not state actors,” – Judge Virginia DeMarchi

MediaPost

The lawsuit brought by the  Divino Group — which distributes GNews! via YouTube — and other LGBT content creators. claimed that YouTube “censored” them by preventing ads from running in some of their videos, placing age restrictions on clips, and tagging other clips with a “restricted mode” aka “mature” audiences designation.

Judge DeMarchi dismissed the claim that Google violated the users’ free speech rights with prejudice — meaning that Divino and the others can’t redraft their complaint and bring that claim again citing a ruling that a federal appellate court sided with Google last year, in a similar lawsuit brought by the anti-LGBT Prager University.

1 thought on “Federal Judge Rules Against LGBT YouTuber Content Creators In ‘Censorship’ Lawsuit

  1. We applaud when courts uphold YouTube/Facebook/Twitter/Etc right to censor content creators who violate their rules about hate speech, misinformation, inciting violence etc. based on the same principles or based on the platforms stated rules. The lawyers for Divino should have known better. There may have been another legal strategy that might have gotten a ruling in their favor.

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.